THE THIRD LAW OF ACTION-REACTION WAS APPLIED INCORRECTLY

Experts in the field of physics could not explain how the upper section alone could have destroyed all the lower sections of the tower.

This is the reason why the top section of the tower totally destroyed the whole tower under the Newton first law of acceleration and the law of conservation of linear momentum, applied correctly.

The September 11 twin towers unexpected collapse was a normal collapse under the applicable laws of physics; but was viewed as [a]normal and [un]explainable.

Over 2000 experts with extensive background in engineering including NIST experts misinterpreted the two main laws of physics, the Newton third law of motion and the principle of conservation of momentum where, although there was about 200 thousand tons of steel structure below the area of impact, the extremely hot temperature of steel of the top combusting section impacted the bottom like a Thor hammer.

This was not a small chunk, but a 50 thousand tons of red-hot structural steel.

The top section had enough kinetic force to destroy the rest of the bottom sections only because the very hot furnace temperatures from within and the very cold temperature of the city of New york made the perfect combination to form a new metal maintaining and enhancing its elasticity therefore destroying the whole tower like a pretzel.

On 2020, I explained how the difference in temperature affected the elasticity of steel behaving differently where the third law of motion Can Not be used in this case.

2020

The third law of action-reaction was a very bad example to explain the collapse of the towers, and this is why nothing made sense.

It's established that nothing can be below [a] falling object, in order for it to achieve acceleration and terminal velocity under the applicable laws; where in this case, office space with all the furniture is not a contributing factor that can restrict the downward momentum and the massive kinetic energy of 50 thousand tons of collapsing steel; except and only for the massive vertical columns supporting the 250 thousand tons structure; understanding that steel vibrates differently under different cold temperatures excluding hot temperatures, and that this same vibration at a very high pitch can cause the steel to break in specific areas also causing concrete to shatter.

The tower was designed to sustain forces of compression like critical bending and critical buckling but not shear or torsion stress forces, due to its tube design with a center shaft of high tensile concrete composed of 4 massive bars of compressed steel, like the ones they use in bridges, also reinforced with high tensile concrete as in rebar.

Although the downward momentum of the collapse was somewhat linear, it was influenced by force of shear and torsion making it vulnerable to the upper load impact stress compression of 50k tons.

Literally, nothing will stop the downward momentum of 50k tons unless the third law of Motion is present where kinetic energy converts into Not deformation but Destruction, as a mass can still have kinetic energy after being deformed and reason being the top section destroyed all the bottom ones.

What people actually heard and saw that day, was not detonations from explosives, but the actual steel bars covered by high tension concrete breaking one by one while the tower started collapsing and this similar effect happens with explosives with adiabatic expansion like in the case of RDX or subsonic expansion speed like in the case of TNT.

Below you will find the Newton third law in progress under different temperatures and basic illustration why in this case the kinetic energy of two identical objects with equal physical properties cannot destroy each other equally by only applying the Newton Third Law of motion. 

Temperature is not always a factor to weaken or destroy structures in minutes, there is also the element of resonance or high pitch vibration called flutter that can destroy an aircraft sending it to the ground.

According to experts including NIST, the collapse violated important laws of physics that could not be explained to the extend they entertained the possibility of controlled demolition to be the cause for the collapse.

The Collapse was Perfectly Legal Under the Second Law of Acceleration and the Law of Conservation of Linear Momentum.

2023

THE NORTH TOWER COLLAPSE DID NOT DESTROY WTC TOWER 7

THIS IS THE REASON WHY THE MASSIVE 47 STEEL COLUMNS MELTED

The answer is quite simple, but first let me show you the massive 80 ton per cross sectional floor area steel columns and the 120-ton columns, out of 47 steel columns that accepted the vertical load of the entire tower.

This is one of the 47 massive steel columns that weighed approximately 80 tons that supposedly melted.

A am providing a video so you understand the heavy weight of just one of these columns and that I am not exaggerating where the heavy lifters can barely pick them up.

I start by saying that kerosene or aviation fuel cannot reach a temperature where it can melt structural steel.

An experiment was conducted back in 2009 where a piece of steel was placed in a furnace of kerosene and the result was as expected, the heat softened the steel column that was placed parallel to the floor.

This the part of the video back on 2020 where I could not explain or understand why the downward momentum gained such acceleration almost equal to the acceleration by gravity and I also said that this phenomenon was going to be explained in the future, and the future happens to be today, the year 2023.

Year 2020

Year 2023

9-8-7-6-5-4-3-2-1 0+1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9+0~> netsh wlan show profiles [0,1=1,0] key=clear

<DOCTYPE html>

<html itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/WebPage" Lang="en-CO">

<head>

<body> jsmodel="jspDDf" data-dt="1" jsaction="xjhTIF:CLIENT;02vyse:.CLIENT;IVKTfe:.CLIENT;Ez7VMc:.CLIENT;YUC7he;Sbg:.CLIENT;qqf0n:.CLIENT">

<style data-iml="135487542140"> . . . </style>

<div jscontroller="NzU6V" class="KxxPG SSwjIe" data-sfe="false" data-sfsw=1200"jsaction="rcuQ6b: npT2md">

<frame>

</body>

</html> start  .  .  .  .

 01110100 01101000 01100101 00100000 01110111 01101111 01110010 01101100 01100100 00100000 01110100 01110010 01100001 01100100 01100101 00100000 01100011 01100101 01101110 01110100 01100101 01110010 00100000 01101110 01101111 01110010 01110100 01101000 00100000 01100001 01101110 01100100 00100000 01110011 01101111 01110101 01110100 01101000 00100000 01110100 01101111 01110111 01100101 01110010 01110011 00100000 01110111 01100101 01110010 01100101 00100000 01100001 01110100 01110100 01100001 01100011 01101011 01100101 01100100 00100000 01100110 01110010 01101111 01101101 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100101 00100000 01110111 01101111 01110010 01101100 01100100 00100000 01110100 01110010 01100001 01100100 01100101 00100000 01100011 01100101 01101110 01110100 01100101 01110010 00100000 01110100 01101111 01110111 01100101 01110010 00100000 00110111 00101110 00100000 01010100 01101000 01100101 00100000 01100111 01101111 01110110 01100101 01110010 01101110 01101101 01100101 01101110 01110100 00100000 01110111 01100001 01101110 01110100 01100101 01100100 00100000 01110100 01101111 00100000 01100100 01100101 01110011 01110100 01110010 01101111 01111001 01100101 01100100 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100101 00100000 01110111 01101111 01110010 01101100 01100100 00100000 01110100 01110010 01100001 01100100 01100101 00100000 01100011 01100101 01101110 01110100 01100101 01110010 00100000 01100011 01101111 01101101 01110000 01101100 01100101 01111000 00100000 01100011 01101111 01101101 01110000 01101111 01110011 01100101 01100100 00100000 01101111 01100110 00100000 00110111 00100000 01110011 01110100 01110010 01110101 01100011 01110100 01110101 01110010 01100101 01110011 00100000 01101001 01101110 00100000 01110100 01101111 01110100 01100001 01101100 00100000 01110111 01101000 01100101 01110010 01100101 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100101 00100000 01101110 01101111 01110010 01110100 01101000 00100000 01100001 01101110 01100100 00100000 01110011 01101111 01110101 01110100 01101000 00100000 01110100 01101111 01110111 01100101 01110010 00100000 01100011 01101111 01101100 01101100 01100001 01110000 01110011 01100101 00100000 01110111 01101111 01110101 01101100 01100100 00100000 01100100 01100101 01110011 01110100 01110010 01101111 01111001 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100101 00100000 01110010 01100101 01110011 01110100 00100000 01101111 01100110 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100101 00100000 01110011 01110100 01110010 01110101 01100011 01110100 01110101 01110010 01100101 01110011 00100000 01100001 01110010 01101111 01110101 01101110 01100100 00100000 01101001 01110100 00101100 00100000 01101001 01101110 01100011 01101100 01110101 01100100 01101001 01101110 01100111 00100000 01110111 01110100 01100011 00100000 00110111 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100001 01110100 00100000 01110111 01100001 01110011 00100000 01100001 01110000 01110000 01110010 01101111 01111000 01101001 01101101 01100001 01110100 01100101 01101100 01111001 00100000 00110001 00101110 00110101 00100000 01100001 01100011 01110010 01100101 01110011 00100000 01100001 01110111 01100001 01111001 00100000 01100110 01110010 01101111 01101101 00100000 01110100 01101111 01110111 01100101 01110010 00100000 00110001 00101110 00100000 01010100 01101000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01101111 01110010 01100100 01100101 01100001 01101100 00100000 01100001 01101100 01101100 01101111 01110111 01100101 01100100 00100000 01100001 00100000 01000011 01100001 01110010 01100111 01101111 00100000 01110011 01101000 01101001 01110000 00100000 01110111 01101001 01110100 01101000 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100101 00100000 01101001 01101110 01101001 01110100 01101001 01100001 01101100 01110011 00100000 01010010 01001000 01000011 00100000 01100010 01100101 01101100 01101111 01101110 01100111 01101001 01101110 01100111 00100000 01110100 01101111 00100000 01110011 01100101 01100011 01110010 01100101 01110100 01100001 01110010 01111001 00100000 01101111 01100110 00100000 01110011 01110100 01100001 01110100 01100101 00100000 01100011 01101100 01101001 01101110 01110100 01101111 01101110 00101100 00100000 01100101 01101110 01110100 01100101 01110010 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100101 00100000 01010101 01010011 00100000 01100110 01110101 01101100 01101100 00100000 01101111 01100110 00100000 01000101 01100011 01110011 01110100 01100001 01110011 01111001 00100000 01110000 01101001 01101100 01101100 01110011 00100000 01100001 01101110 01100100 00100000 01101101 01100101 01110100 01100001 01101101 01110000 01101000 01100101 01110100 01100001 01101101 01101001 01101110 01100101 01110011 00101110 00100000 01010100 01101000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01110111 01100001 01110011 00100000 01110000 01100001 01110010 01110100 00100000 01101111 01100110 00100000 01101101 01111001 00100000 01101001 01101110 01110110 01100101 01110011 01110100 01101001 01100111 01100001 01110100 01101001 01101111 01101110 00100000 01101001 01101110 00100000 00110010 00110000 00110000 00110110 00100000 01110000 01110010 01101001 01101111 01110010 00100000 01110100 01101111 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100101 00100000 00110111 00101101 01101101 01101111 01101110 01110100 01101000 00100000 01100100 01100101 01110000 01101100 01101111 01111001 01101101 01100101 01101110 01110100 00100000 01110100 01101111 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100101 00100000 01010000 01100101 01110010 01110011 01101001 01100001 01101110 00100000 01000111 01110101 01101100 01100110 00101110

<DOCTYPE html>

<html itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/WebPage" Lang="en-CO">

<head>

<body> jsmodel="jspDDf" data-dt="1" jsaction="xjhTIF:CLIENT;02vyse:.CLIENT;IVKTfe:.CLIENT;Ez7VMc:.CLIENT;YUC7he;Sbg:.CLIENT;qqf0n:.CLIENT">

<style data-iml="135487542140"> . . . </style>

<div jscontroller="NzU6V" class="KxxPG SSwjIe" data-sfe="false" data-sfsw=1200"jsaction="rcuQ6b: npT2md">

<frame>

</body>

</html> end  .  .  .  .

.   .   .   <~9-8-7-6-5-4-3-2-1 0 +1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9+0~>  .   .   .   .

.   .

Control Demolition was not the cause for the Collapse.

When controlled explosives are used in controlled demolition, nothing ejects outward because the detonation sequence does not allow the floors time to compress.

Tower 7 was controlled demolished to destroy evidence about the terrorist attack to the north and south towers conducted the same day and reason being the site was not treated as a crime scene rather the evidence was cleaned up very quickly by military personnel.

This is controlled demolition with the normal downward dynamic starting with world trade center tower 7.  Notice that there is no outward ejection.

This is not a collapse by controlled demolition where the compression of the floors has to be decompressed by the outward ejection of all its content.  Keep in mind that an impact compression 50 thousand tons can only be stopped by 50 thousand tons of resistance according to the third law of reaction where both blocks the upper and the lower blocks destroy each other equally.

For many reasons, controlled demolition has to be eliminated from the equation of probabilities, and the very first one is actually the easiest to understand, the tower had to be completely evacuated as preparation for the area of demolition, including every single office space had to be cleared up from office furniture and all that came with it, so the concrete could be shattered with special heavy machinery that act as an impact hammer to expose the steel areas of the structure to place the special rdx used to slice the steel like a blade in a special angle forming a like a triangle sort of speak, to have a successful controlled collapse and with the minimal amount of collateral damage to buildings around it; in other words, the tower had to become a demolition site where only construction workers and engineers are allowed to enter.

The second reason, the elevator shaft area of the elevator section, had to first be cut in different sections per floor, in order for the collapse to be safe and without causing colateral damage to structures around it and that is precisely the first question they ask, why did the tower collapse toward the center as in controlled demolitions but still created collateral damage to surrounding buildings.

The preparation of a building requires also removing and boring some parts of the structure like walls a to avoid air compression forces to be built from within, and also covering the bottom part with a net to catch all the ejected pieces to minimize collateral damage to nearby buildings.

The third one, more than just one demolition companies per tower had to be working with the preparation in order to complete the project in 12 months, considering the number of floors per tower; this was not a one-night job like many assume.

Even if assuming that controlled demolition was employed, and the tower resulted in a free fall collapse, this is not what we saw that day with the north and south towers, tons of metal debree being ejected outward while the top sections were collapsing creating compression below, which is in part consistent with the tremendous amount of air pressure caused by a compression of floors that cannot escape and rather looks like the floors are exploding while the collapse is in progress which immediately eliminates the possibility of a free fall collapse produced by a controlled detonation which is in part what we saw with world trade center tower 7, a collapse without compression.

In the case of the tower with a tube design, compression was created from within, as the tower successfully pancaked, but since the compression was not high, it did not create further inner forces to sort of decelerate the downward momentum developed by gravity and upper floors compression, but it did create collateral damage to buildings around the collapsing tower by the ejection of steel structures according to the Bernoulli's Principle, and this is why we saw steel beams ejecting outward from the center of the elevator shaft area with the exception of tower 7 being demolished the same day of the terrorist attack.

If the floors would have pancaked, in the hot city of Miami, the collapse would have taken several minutes, considering the conservation of linear momentum along with the strong factor that suggest that the bottom floors were healthy and not compromised by the element of heat nor the element of New York cold temperature but and since we have to consider the laws of physics in this case, then the destruction would have taken place on the two upper sections of the tower; and not the bottom.

THE TWO COMMERCIAL BOEING 767's NEVER CRASHED

First before anything, let me add that, the base that I used to work for was next to an Air Force Base where I had the opportunity to see up close how these drones were set up and serviced.

This Air Force Base is located in Point Mugu, California; a place that does not appear in google maps unless you know how to access it with JavaScript and html commands.

This are images of google maps where they do a great job hiding stuff so people can't see what they don't want you to see.

The military version and the civilian version are very similar looking aircraft except for the mechanical, electronic and aerodynamic capabilities.

The military version can go up to mach 1 at low altitude.

Has a ceiling of 60 thousand feet at mach 1.4.

Has two 747 Rolls Roy's engines unlike the civilian version with (GE or P&W).

Can be piloted remotely.

Can carry weaponry and missiles under the belly.

A civilian version could never pass mach with 767 high tech engines.

By the way, I am an aviation mechanic and rather work on turbo fan engines or jet engines; not propellers, it's really boring disassembling propellers for maintenance.

One thing I noticed before becoming a plane captain, these people rather use brutal force when applying torque or use manual screw drivers rather than using a low voltage battery drill.

The advantage of using tools rather than brutal force is quite simple to understand, more accuracy, better maintenance time under less stress, and less damage to tools and aircraft parts.

Flight 175 was a United Airlines plane equipped with two Pratt & Wittney JT9D-7R4D engines designed only for civilian Boeing 767 models.

So, if flight 175 did not crash, then where is the aircraft?

The two airliners that supposedly crashed are in service with a different registration number obviously.

When Dick Chainey ordered to land all the aircraft airborne these two airliners landed in a military base under a different transcriber.

how they managed to silence all the passenger is just incredible.

So, everyone died with the impact including flight attendant mentioned below.

So, we search his name, and this comes up.

This could also be a computer error where the algorithm still thinks is not dead and rather living a cool life after an accident.